Can science disprove God? Many of those within the landscape of modern science would reply with an adamant “yes.” However, Fr. Spitzer would beg to differ. In fact, throughout the course of Fr. Spitzer’s lecture, he presents four profound pieces of evidence which indicate that our universe has a beginning, possesses intelligent design, and contains rational animals that possess a transphysical soul—all of which ultimately are predicable of a supreme, intelligent being.
Fr. Spitzer begins by asserting that it is quite difficult to disprove the existence of God, as it is difficult to disprove anything at all, even based on observational evidence. Meaning since difficulty arises when trying to disprove thoroughly even that which is physical, a being like God who is beyond the “event horizon” is twice as difficult to disprove. However, if science could prove that the universe does not have a beginning, then it would follow that there could theoretically not be a God.
Fr. Spitzer acknowledges four pieces of evidence that indicate the creation of a universe and an argument of an intelligent creator:
Fr. Spitzer states that there must be a beginning of time for the universe to move from nothing to something. Although general scientific thought permitted the notion of time going back infinitely for a while, after 1927, there has been a radical shift in our understanding of cosmological physics. The cause of this shift in thought is Fr. Spitzer’s first piece of evidence for a Creator.
During the 20th century, three scientists, Arvind Borde, Alan Guth, and Alexander Vilenkin, posed the question as to whether or not physics could prove that the universe has a beginning. They provided an answer to this question through the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Proof. The goal of the proof was to challenge multiverse, static, and oscillating universe theories and demonstrate that the universe has a starting point. The theorem goes as follows:
The proof concludes that the rate of expansion of the universe is greater than zero, and all universes must have a beginning, as every inflationary rate is greater than zero. Thus, the B-V-G proof strongly indicates an absolute beginning of all physical reality.
The second piece of evidence Fr. Spitzer presents to indicate the creation of a universe and an argument of an intelligent creator is the law of entropy, or what is also referred to as the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Fr. Spitzer’s argument is as follows:
Entropy shows exactly what the B-V-G Theorem shows: it is highly likely that the universe has an initial creation point.
Anthropic coincidences describe highly improbable conditions of the universe necessary for the origination and development of life forms. According to Fr. Spitzer, for life to occur, there must be initial conditions and universal constants. Meaning if initial conditions of low entropy and the limits of universal constants are not met, it is impossible for life to form.
However, Fr. Spitzer explains that the likelihood of low entropy at the time of the Big Bang would be 10 to a power which goes on to have more zeros than the universe can hold. Meaning the fact that we have the implicit order and design of our universe is nothing short of a miracle. He proposes an argument for the possibility of supernatural design:
Fr. Spitzer posits that all three pieces of evidence, B-V-G, Law of Entropy, and anthropic coincidences, present a scientifically valid argument for the existence of a transcendent Creator who intelligently designed our universe.
The last piece of evidence Fr. Spitzer presents is tailored towards the existence of a transphysical soul. He presents studies conducted on those who experienced clinical death and some level of immaterial and scientifically confounding experience. Clinical death can be understood as the absence of electrical activity in the cerebral cortex and in the lower brain. The four studies he presents each indicate a different aspect and effect of clinical death and NDEs. There are as follows:
Fr. Spitzer claims that the overwhelming amount of clinical studies and evidence suggests that there is something going on that is not of this world, the only suitable explanation being the existence of a transphysical soul.
The four pieces of evidence presented by Fr. Spitzer challenge the misconception that science is incompatible with God. In fact, Fr. Spitzer argues that something like scientific atheism is not a logical conclusion of science but rather a personal choice, as one would have to ignore the Law of Entropy and blatant anthropic coincidences to hold such a position.
We have overwhelming evidence to indicate the existence of a Creator and the beginning of the universe, more than science has ever possessed. But, in some regard, this evidence remains lost to many people. Fr. Spitzer claims that now is the time to approach science, God, and Creation in a manner that will truly help others cross over the threshold toward the logical synthesis of faith and reason.
Watch the entire presentation below: